Help write a funding proposal
Use an organisation’s own information to prepare a letter or small grant proposal. This course is in development.
Original course title & technical overview
Grant and Proposal Writing. Find the right funders, build a reusable proposal library from the organization’s real facts, and write applications that answer every question in the funder’s own words, with a budget that adds up.
A new word? Look it up in plain English →
2026 EDITIONWhat you can offer
Use an organisation’s own information to prepare a letter or small grant proposal. This course is in development.
Detailed deliverables
Grant writing for small nonprofits and community organizations (and proposal writing for small businesses answering RFPs): a funder prospect list with fit scores, a proposal library (mission, need statement, program descriptions, outcomes, budget, bios, boilerplate) built from the organization’s real documents, and complete applications written to the funder’s questions and limits, with a budget and the attachments checklist.
Tools (free plans have limits): Claude or ChatGPT (with a Project per organization), Funder databases: Candid Foundation Directory (library access is often free), Instrumentl trial, GrantStation, state and federal portals (Grants.gov, state arts/health councils), The organization’s documents: 990, audit or financials, program reports, board list, strategic plan, Google Sheets: prospects, deadlines, submissions, outcomes, Google Docs for the library and drafts; the funder’s portal for submission
You will make
- A funder prospect list with fit scores and a deadline calendar
- A proposal library from the organization’s documents (facts with sources)
- A need statement and program narrative that answer a funder’s questions in their words
- A budget with a budget narrative that reconciles to the request
- A full application with the attachments checklist and the submission record
Inside this course
4 lessons · 5 AI instruction templates · 4 worked examples · 3 exam versions · final practice projectLesson 1 is open as a free preview, ready-to-use AI instructions included. Sign up free to unlock the rest and try AI instructions in the practice area.
- 1🔒 Sign inWhat you will learn · 2 min
- 2🔒 Sign inSet up your tools · 10 min
- 3Preview freeProspecting and fit · 40 minFind funders whose giving actually matches the organization, score fit from their 990 and guidelines, and build a calendar of deadlines worth chasing.
- 4🔒 Sign inThe proposal library · 45 minBuild the reusable library from the organization’s documents: mission and history, need statement with data, program descriptions, outcomes with evidence, bios, financials, boilerplate, every fact with a source.
- 5🔒 Sign inNarrative and budget · 55 minAnswer the funder’s questions in the funder’s words within their limits, structure the narrative as need → program → outcomes → capacity → sustainability, and build a budget that reconciles to the request with a narrative that explains every line.
- 6🔒 Sign inAttachments, submission, reporting and the retainer · 40 minThe attachments checklist, the review pass, the submission record, the decline follow-up, grant reports that keep funders giving, and the monthly retainer that makes this a steady income.
- 7🔒 Sign inCertification exam · 20 min10 questions · 80% to pass · three versions, a retake is never the same test.
- 8🔒 Sign inFinal project: A Hunger Relief Fund application for Harbor Light Food Pantry · 75 minA Hunger Relief Fund application for Harbor Light Food Pantry: graded on 5 criteria, pass at 15/20.
- 9🔒 Sign inCheck your work · 15 min
- 10🔒 Sign inFeedback and certificate · 5 min
- 11🔒 Sign inPublish your service · 20 min
Final practice project: A Hunger Relief Fund application for Harbor Light Food Pantry
A practice assignment from a sample client. You will see the scoring guide (rubric) before you start.
| What we check | What earns the full 4 points |
|---|---|
| Brief followed | The Fund’s questions, limits, attachments and deadline used; all deliverables present |
| Fit and prospecting | Scores justified from guidelines and giving history; realistic deadlines; inquiry email sendable |
| Fact discipline | Every number and partner traceable to the documents or a cited dataset; gaps as questions; nothing invented |
| Narrative and budget | Answers the questions in the funder’s words, within limits, specific; budget reconciles and narrative shows the arithmetic |
| Submission readiness | Reviewer pass finds and fixes real issues; checklist and log complete; ethics (flat fee, org submits) respected |
Honest expectations. Grant writing is facts plus fit. The AI drafts beautifully and will invent statistics, outcomes and partnerships if you let it; every number, every claim and every partner in an application must come from the organization’s documents or a cited source. Win rates for well-matched applications are 10–30%; promising an award is dishonest. Fees are flat, paid by the organization, never contingent on the grant.